Effect of Monthly Fuel Price Reviews on Operational Sustainability of Lusaka’s Minibus Operators in Zambia
1Astin Phiri, 2Chrine C. Hapompwe
1,2Graduate School of Business, The University of Zambia 10101 Great East Road Campus, Lusaka, Zambia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i4-19ABSTRACT:
The transportation sector plays a vital role in Zambia’s economy, with minibuses being the primary mode of public transport in Lusaka. However, the frequent and unpredictable nature of monthly fuel price reviews presents significant challenges to the sustainability of minibus transport operations. This study investigated the effects of these fuel price fluctuations on financial stability, service quality, and long-term viability. Using a qualitative exploratory approach, data was collected through structured interviews with 10 minibus drivers and 5 operators, selected using the saturation method. Additional insights were obtained from regulatory authorities and commuter representatives. Findings reveal that fuel price fluctuations negatively impact profitability and operational efficiency. Operators often respond to rising fuel costs by increasing fares, which results in commuter dissatisfaction and a shift toward alternative transport options, such as illegal taxis and ride-sharing services. Uncertainty around fuel pricing discourages investment in fleet upgrades, leading to the continued use of older, less fuel-efficient vehicles. To manage financial pressures, operators cut maintenance costs, reduce driver wages, and extend working hours, which actions reduce service quality and affect driver welfare. The absence of an automatic fare adjustment system forces operators into reactive decisions rather than strategic planning. Although fuel price reviews aim to align with global market trends, their current structure undermines operational sustainability. To mitigate these effects, the study recommends introducing a more predictable and transparent fuel pricing framework, targeted subsidies for public transport operators, and incentives for adopting fuel-efficient technologies. It also calls for stronger collaboration among government agencies, fuel suppliers, and transport associations to develop policies that support stability in the sector. In conclusion, while fuel price reviews are economically necessary, their unpredictable implementation significantly burdens minibus operators. A more comprehensive transport policy is needed to support sustainability, with further research into alternative fuels and long-term pricing strategies.
KEYWORDS:
Fuel, Price, Monthly, Reviews, Operational, Sustainability, Minibus Operators, Lusaka.
REFERENCES:
1) Akumu, J. &Mahalu, K. (2022). Fuel price volatility and public transportation: Case studies from Kenya and Tanzania. African Journal of Transport and Society, 14(3), 129-146.
2) Almeida, R., & da Silva, P. (2021). Biofuels and fuel price stabilization: Lessons from Brazil and Indonesia. Energy Policy Journal, 35(2), 145-162.
3) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.
4) Cardoso, L., & Ferreira, M. (2020). Fuel efficiency and operational strategies in urban transportation: The case of Brazilian public buses. Urban Transport and Sustainability, 7(4), 125-138.
5) Chileshe, B., & Banda, M. (2021). The impact of fuel import dependency on Zambia’s economic stability. Energy Policy Journal, 45(2), 67-89.
6) Creswell, J. W., &Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7) Dudley, C. (2022). Fuel Price Frustrations and Management Approaches in Coach Operations. Route-One. Retrieved from www.route-one.net.
8) Georgiadis, G., Politis, I., &Papaioannou, P. (2020). How Does Operational Environment Influence Public Transport Effectiveness? Evidence from European Urban Bus Operators. Sustainability, 12(12), 4919. DOI:10.3390/su12124919.
9) Gonzales, M., & Chang, R. (2022). Customizing fuel blends for emerging markets: Efficiency and environmental considerations. Journal of Sustainable Energy, 34(1), 112-130.
10) Gonzalez, M., & Chang, L. (2022). The role of FinTech in public transport revenue management. Journal of Transport Economics, 40(4), 320-338.
11) Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076.
12) Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427.
13) Ivanov, D., & Petrova, Y. (2023). Russia’s refinery expansion: Strategies for energy security and market dominance. Russian Energy Studies, 29(3), 145-178.
14) Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (JCTR). (2024). Economic effects of fuel pricing policies on Zambia’s public sector. Lusaka, Zambia.
15) Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection. (2024). The economic effect of fuel price volatility on Zambia’s transport sector. JCTR Economic Review, 12(1), 22-34.
16) Kabandala, M. (2022). Financial challenges facing small-scale public transport operators in Zambia. Journal of African Urban Studies, 7(1), 98-113.
17) Kabandala, M. (2022). Financial challenges facing small-scale public transport operators in Zambia. Journal of African Urban Studies, 7(1), 98-113.
18) Kabandala, R. (2022). Fuel price adjustments and public transport operational costs in Kenya. East African Journal of Economics, 15(3), 53-68.
19) Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., &Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
20) Kimani, P., & Otieno, J. (2020). Cooperative fuel purchasing as a strategy for mitigating transport costs in Kenya. East African Transport Review, 12(3), 210-225.
21) Kowalski, P., & Nowak, A. (2022). Refinery modernization in Poland: Balancing sustainability and profitability. Central European Energy Review, 38(4), 90-120.
22) Litman, T. (2021). Fuel price fluctuations and the future of public transit: An international perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 152, 108-118.
23) Martinez, J., & Roberts, T. (2021). Fuel subsidies and public transport affordability in developing economies. International Journal of Transport Policy, 29(1), 87-105.
24) Masondo, P., &Dlamini, T. (2022). Adaptive strategies among South African minibus taxi operators facing fuel price volatility. South African Journal of Transport Economics, 18(3), 49-61.
25) Morales, R., & Cardoso, S. (2021). Economic adaptation in Latin American public transportation under fluctuating fuel prices. Journal of Public Transportation Research, 5(1), 112-125.
26) Mwange, A., Marebesa, M., Chaampita, M., & Matoka, W. (2022). An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Fuel Pricing and Demand in Zambia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 13(20), 95-110. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365598085_An_Empirical_Analysis_of_the_Relationship_Between_
Fuel_Pricing_and_Demand_in_Zambia
27) Mwangi, D., & Njoroge, C. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for electric minibuses in sub-Saharan Africa. Renewable Transport Journal, 18(5), 412-430.
28) Nabukeera, M., &Mpiima, J. (2022). Effects of fuel price hikes on Uganda's urban transport sector. Journal of Urban Economics and Policy, 15(4), 223-236.
29) Nabukeera, M., &Mpiima, J. (2022). Effects of fuel price hikes on Uganda's urban transport sector. Journal of Urban Economics and Policy, 15(4), 223-236.
30) Nchito, W. (2022). Enhancing the Utility and Sustainability of Popular Transport. SLOCAT Partnership. Retrieved from https://slocat.net/enhancing-the-utility-and-sustainability-of-popular-transport/
31) Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., &Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
32) Owusu, F., & Boateng, E. (2022). Public transport subsidies and operational sustainability in Ghana. West African Journal of Urban Mobility, 25(2), 178-195.
33) Patel, R., & Singh, H. (2023). The economic feasibility of electric public transport in African cities. Journal of Sustainable Transport, 15(1), 56-75.
34) Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35) Pfeffer, J., &Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
36) Pillay, M., & Seedat, S. (2022). Adapting to fuel price volatility: The case of South African minibus taxis. African Transport Studies Journal, 10(4), 305-320.
37) Raharjo, A., Siregar, T., &Arifin, D. (2021). Fuel price volatility and its implications on service quality in Indonesia’s public transport sector. Southeast Asian Journal of Urban Mobility, 14(2), 95-108.
38) Sharma, P., & Gupta, K. (2021). Coping mechanisms among Indian public transport operators amid rising fuel costs. Asian Transport Studies, 13(3), 88-101.
39) Sharma, S., & Prakash, D. (2020). Fuel price changes and sustainability challenges in urban transportation: Evidence from India. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(5), 207-220.
40) Siamachoka, A., Kunda, J., &Chanda, T. (2024). Financial sustainability challenges of Zambia’s minibus operators in a volatile fuel market. Zambian Journal of Public Transportation, 16(1), 61-74.
41) Siamachoka, J., et al. (2024). Implications of fuel price reviews on the operational costs of public transport in Zambia. African Journal of Transport and Society, 18(2), 112-130.
42) Siamachoka, J., et al. (2024). Implications of fuel price reviews on the operational costs of public transport in Zambia. African Journal of Transport and Society, 18(2), 112-130.
43) Singh, A., & Rahman, M. (2021). The impact of collective fuel purchasing on transport cost reduction. Asian Journal of Transport Economics, 33(2), 180-195.
44) Thompson, B., & Bradley, K. (2021). Fuel hedging strategies in public transport: Lessons from the UK. Transport Finance Review, 14(3), 222-238.
45) Thope, T. (2023). An Analysis of Monthly Fuel Price Adjustments on the Sales of Courier Service Operators in Selected Parts of Lusaka District for the Period 2020-2022. Master's Thesis, University of Zambia. Retrieved from https://dspace.unza.zm/handle/123456789/9087
46) ZAM (Zambia Association of Manufacturers). (2022). Sectoral effects of monthly fuel price reviews in Zambia: A focus on transportation and manufacturing. ZAM Quarterly Economic Bulletin, 7(2), 15-30.
47) Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA). (2022). Fuel Pricing and Environmental Effect: Monthly Review Mechanisms in Zambia.
48) Zambia Ministry of Transport (ZAM). (2022). Transport sector report on fuel pricing and public transport sustainability. Government of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
49) Zhang, W., & Liu, H. (2022). China's refinery investments and energy security. Asian Petroleum Review, 50(2), 56-78.