JEFMS Journal

Google Scholar

Article Pdf

---

ABSTRACT:

In many developing nations, weak institutional quality presents significant hurdles for SMEs, hindering their ability to thrive in international markets due to issues like corruption, Bureaucratic red-tapeism, and unpredictable regulations. As a result, there is a widespread acknowledgement that the quality of institutions profoundly shapes the landscape in which SMEs operate, impacting their survival and export capabilities. This study sets out to explore the intricate relationship between institutional quality and export intensity within Nigeria's diverse geopolitical zones. To achieve this, data was collected from all six geopolitical zones in Nigeria and analyzed it using logistic regression techniques. The study reveals a positive relationship between institutional quality and export intensity in Nigeria, but this relationship varies across different geopolitical zones. This study also highlights the crucial role of institutional quality in driving export-led growth and economic development, shedding light on the complexities inherent in navigating diverse institutional environments. By uncovering these dynamics, the study provides valuable insights for policymakers, businesses, and stakeholders seeking to enhance export performance and foster sustainable economic development.

KEYWORDS:

Institutional Quality, Export Intensity, Institutional-Based View, SMEs, Logistic Regression Techniques.

REFERENCES:

1) Bernard, D. T., Almeida, A., Perera, S., Jayarathna, H., & Munasighe, A. A. (2019). The Effect of Working Capital Management on the Export Performance of Small and Medium Export Enterprises: Evidence from Export Manufacturing Sector in Sri Lanka. The Asian Institute of Research: Journal of Economics and Business, 2(3). 660-675.

2) Abreo, C., Bustillo, R., & Rodriguez, C. (2021). The role of institutional quality in the international trade of a Latin American country: evidence from Colombian export performance. Journal of Economic Structures, 10:24.

3) Agnihotri, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Determinants of export intensity in emerging markets: An upper echelon perspective. Journal of World Business, 50(4), 687-695.

4) Anderson, J. E., & Marcouiller, D. (2002). Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 342–35.

5) Bekteshi, S. A. (2019). The impact of education and training on export performance of SMEs. Research in Business & Social Science, 8(6). 272-277.

6) Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Voss, H., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., & Zheng, P. (2018). A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1), 4–23.

7) Chor, D. (2010). Unpacking sources of comparative advantage: A quantitative approach. Journal of International Economics, 82(2), 152–167.

8) Estrin, S., Meyer, K. E., Wright, M., & Foliano, F. (2008). Export propensity and intensity of subsidiaries in emerging economies. International Business Review, 17(5), 574-586.

9) Gao, G. Y., Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2010). A “strategy tripod” perspective on export behaviours: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 377-396.

10) Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Chung, M. L., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.

11) Iwanow, T., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2007). Trade facilitation, regulatory quality and export performance. Journal of International Development, 19(6), 735–753.

12) Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, L. C., & Morgan, N. A. (2000). Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 493–511.

13) Khan, M. F., Khan, M. I., & Naqvi, K. A. (2022). Impact of Institutional Quality on Trade Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pakistan. Journal of Economic Sciences, 1(1). 33-47.

14) Krasniqi, B. A., & Desai, S. (2017). Institutions and Export Performance in 26 Transition Economies. Springer International Publishing, 57-73.

15) Lee, S. H., & Weng, D. H. (2013). Does bribery in the home country promote or dampen firm exports? Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1472-1487.

16) Leonidou, L. C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(3), 279–302.

17) Li, J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, H. (2013). The Quality of Domestic Legal Institutions and Export Performance Theory and Evidence from China. Management International Review,53(3). 361-390.

18) Lin, J., Flachsbarth, I., & von Cramon‐Taubadel, S. (2020). The role of institutional quality on the performance in the export of coconut products. Agricultural Economics journal, 51(2), 237–258.

19) LiPuma, J. A., Newbert, S. L., & Doh, J. P. (2013). The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies: a contingency model of firm age and size. Small Business Economics, Springer, 40(4), 817-841.

20) Lu, J. Y., Xu, B., & Liu, X. H. (2009). The effects of corporate governance and institutional environments on export behaviour in emerging economies evidence from China. Management International Review, 49, 455–478.

21) Mansilla-Fernandez, J. M., & Milgram-Baleix, J. (2022). Working Capital Management, Financial Constraints, and Exports. Evidence from European and US Manufacturers. ThE PAPERS, 1-44.

22) Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The psychology of dictatorship. American Psychological Association.: Washington, DC.

23) Ngo, V. D., Janssen, F., Leonidou, L., & Christodoulides, P. (2016). Domestic institutional attributes as drivers of export performance in an emerging and transition economy. Journal of Business Research, 1-12.

24) Nunn, N. (2007). Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts, and the pattern of trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 569–600.

25) Nuruzzaman, N., Gaur, A. S., & Singh, D. (2020). Institutional Support and Hazards, and Internationalization of Emerging Market Firms. Global Strategy Journal, 10(2). 361- 385.

26) Peng, W. M., Sun, L. S., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. Academy of Management Perspective, 23, 63-81.

27) Pistor, K., Berkowitz, D., & Moenius, J. (2006). Trade, law, and product complexity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 363–373.

28) Sapsford, D., & Garikipati, S. (2006). Trade Liberalisation, Economic Development and Poverty Alleviation. The World Economy, 29(11). 1571-1579.

29) Sousa, C. M., Martínez-López, F. J., & Coelho, F. (2008). The Determinants of Export Performance 2008The Determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4). 343-374.

30) Wang, W., & Ma, H. (2018). Export strategy, export intensity and learning: Integrating the resource perspective and institutional perspective. Journal of World Business, 581-592.

31) Wei, S.-J., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Local Corruption and Global Capital Flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2(2000). 303-354.

32) Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior.Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.

33) Wengel, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2006). SME Export Performance in Indonesia After the Crisis.Small Business Economics, 26(1). 25-37.

34) Wu, J., Li, S., & Samsell, D. (2012). Why some countries trade more, some trade less, some trade almost nothing: The effect of the governance environment on trade flows. International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), 225-238.

35) Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375-404.